View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 2-6 h | 1-2 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-10 | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |



