View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 5-15 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-20 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |