methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Theory of Constraints Thinking Process.
Systems Thinking
Theory of Constraints Thinking Process
Purposedifferent
When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.The Theory of Constraints Thinking Process exposes a system's bottleneck and the logic behind it. It suits situations where many symptoms trace back to the same limiting relationship.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighHighHigh
Timedifferent
20-40 min initial, dann laufend2-6 h2-6 h0.5-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-153-83-104-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ROAM Board, Owner ListCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsCurrent Reality Logic, Conflict Cloud, Future Reality Tree, Implementation Obstacles
Tagsno overlap
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Theory of ConstraintsConstraintsSystems thinkingCausality
Add more methods