View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Bucket System |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a large batch of work needs a fast, rough estimate, it sorts items into predefined size buckets. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, and Split Candidates. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30-90 min | 30-60 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-12 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, Split Candidates | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |