View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 45-60 min | 1-2 h | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 2-8 | 1-8 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |