View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Growth A/B Testing |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30-90 min | 1-4 Wochen | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-12 | 1-6 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |