Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:ROAM Board Architecture Decision Record ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Risk Storming

Criterion	Agile ROAM Board	Architecture Architecture Decision Record	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Architecture Risk Storming
Purposedifferent	When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.	An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.
Complexitydifferent	Low	Low	Medium	Low
Timedifferent	20-40 min initial, dann laufend	15-45 min	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	60-90 min
Participantsdifferent	3-15	1-3	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	4-12
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Async	Workshop + async	Workshop
Outputdifferent	ROAM Board, Owner List	ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap	RiskAgileTrackingAlignment	ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation

Add more methods