View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Growth A/B Testing |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-4 Wochen | 60-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 1-6 | 3-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |