View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Growth A/B Testing |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-4 Wochen | 60-90 min | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 1-6 | 3-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |