View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 45-90 min | 45-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |