methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a calibrated five-by-five risk matrix with response cards.
Decision Making
Risk Matrix
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Purposedifferent
When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min90-180 min1-2 h30 min Setup, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-104-124-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Risk Matrix, Top Risk ListDecision Rights Matrix, AgreementAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsRAID Log, Status Report Source
Tagsno overlap
RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
Add more methods