methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper illustration of Power-Interest Grid with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Facilitation
Power Interest Grid
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Purposedifferent
A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy.Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
30-90 min15-30 min30-60 min0.5-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-102-82-85-15
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Problem Framing NotesQuestion List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsPower Interest Grid, Strategy per StakeholderRich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
Add more methods