View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Rich Picture | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting | ![]() Decision Making Cynefin Workshop | ![]() Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 5-15 min | 60-180 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-20 | 4-20 | 5-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Rich Picture, Problem Framing Notes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ComplexitySensemakingDecision | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |



