methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper illustration of Team Cognitive Load Assessment with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Cognitive Load Assessment
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Purposedifferent
A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min45-90 min60-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-103-103-123-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Problem Framing NotesDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsCognitive Load Profile, Action ListResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
AutonomyRolesTeam
TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Add more methods