methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min60-180 min20-45 minHalber Tag bis 2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-1012-100+1-815-200
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesSession Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
Add more methods