View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Responsibility PokerTheory of Constraints Thinking ProcessDelegation PokerEvaporating Cloud
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Systems Thinking Theory of Constraints Thinking Process |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | The Theory of Constraints Thinking Process exposes a system's bottleneck and the logic behind it. It suits situations where many symptoms trace back to the same limiting relationship. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 0.5-3 Tage | 45-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-10 | 3-10 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Current Reality Logic, Conflict Cloud, Future Reality Tree, Implementation Obstacles | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | Theory of ConstraintsConstraintsSystems thinkingCausality | AutonomyRolesTeam | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking |