methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min20-45 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-104-121-84-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsStarfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions
Tags1 shared
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
Add more methods