View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective | ![]() Operations Accountability Ladder | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 20-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-12 | 1-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tags1 shared | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |



