methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min15-30 minHalber Tag bis 2 Tage45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-815-2003-10
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsQuestion List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsSession Board, Session Notes, Community LearningsDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
AutonomyRolesTeam
Add more methods