View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Decision Making OODA Loop | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue | ![]() Decision Making Force Field Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 15-60 min je Zyklus | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-8 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | ChangeDecisionStrategy |



