methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of MORT Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
MORT Analysis
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 minMehrere Tage bis Wochen20-45 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-61-82-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsMORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic RecommendationsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Root causeSafetySystemicIncident
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods