methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for OODA Loop.
Decision Making
OODA Loop
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 minHalf day45–75 min15-60 min je Zyklus
Participantsdifferent
3-103-12Team members involved1-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsLeverage Map, Action Strategy4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsSituation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
DecisionChangeLearningStrategy
Add more methods