View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Systems Thinking Iceberg Model | ![]() Operations Accountability Ladder | ![]() Operations Family Tree Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 20-45 min | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-10 | 1-8 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Family Tree Diagram, Pattern Notes, Systemic Measures |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | Root causePatternsIncidentSystemic |



