View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Agile Example Mapping |  Decision Making RAPID |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-7 | 3-12 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | DecisionRolesGovernance | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |