methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper illustration of System Dynamics Simulation with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
System Dynamics Simulation
Paper illustration for Behavior Over Time Graph.
Systems Thinking
Behavior Over Time Graph
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports.A Behavior Over Time Graph shows how a metric or observation develops over time. The method makes trends, breaks, and recurring patterns visible that get lost in snapshots.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 minMehrere Tage bis Wochen20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-103-101-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron1-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsSimulation Model, Scenario ReportsBehavior Over Time Graph, Trend Hypotheses, Key Events
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
AutonomyRolesTeam
Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis
Systems thinkingPatternsDynamics
Add more methods