View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Decision Jam |  Operations Accountability Ladder |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 20-45 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-10 | 1-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |