methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min60-90 min20-45 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-104-101-82-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
Add more methods