methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-103-82-103-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsCATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Add more methods