View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Innovation Brainwriting | ![]() Agile Bucket System | ![]() Facilitation Mind Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When loud voices or hierarchy distort the idea search, the method creates a quiet entry into joint development. It gives everyone thinking space and gathers contributions without social brakes, making diversity more visible and easier to build on. | When a large batch of work needs a fast, rough estimate, it sorts items into predefined size buckets. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, and Split Candidates. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 15-30 min | 30-90 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-12 | 3-12 | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Idea sheets, Expanded concepts, Prioritized list | Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, Split Candidates | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | BrainstormingCollaborationInclusionIdeas | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation |



