View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Operations Accountability Ladder |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-90 min | 20-45 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-12 | 1-8 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |