View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Responsibility PokerAccountability LadderSpotify Model MappingTeam Topologies Interaction Modes
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Operations Accountability Ladder | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping | ![]() Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 20-45 min | 90-180 min | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-8 | 5-15 | Team-Leads plus Architecture |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair |
Tags1 shared | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization |



