methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
Purposedifferent
When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min20-45 min30-60 min je Interview30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-101-85-12 Interviews1-5
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsCompleted Experiment Canvas, Success Metric
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
Add more methods