View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Decision Making OODA Loop | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45–75 min | 15-60 min je Zyklus | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | Team members involved | 1-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |



