methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Purposedifferent
For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-4 h30 min Setup, dann laufend15-45 min1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-81-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone1-31-4
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Challenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanRAID Log, Status Report SourceADR File, Decision Log, RationaleArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View
Tagsno overlap
RiskDecisionSensemaking
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Add more methods