methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Purposedifferent
In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min60-180 min15-45 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-1212-100+1-31-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision LogTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale
Tagsno overlap
DecisionRolesGovernance
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Add more methods