View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making RAPID |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 45-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-20 | 2-8 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionRolesGovernance | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |