methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Purposedifferent
In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 h30 min Setup, dann laufend60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-125-301-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone4-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision LogConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasRAID Log, Status Report SourceProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment
Tagsno overlap
DecisionRolesGovernance
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
Add more methods