View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making RAPID | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Agile Mad Sad Glad |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45–75 min | 15-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Team members involved | 1-3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionRolesGovernance | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveTeamReflection |



