View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min | 15-45 min | 60–90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 | 1-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange |