View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:RAID LogSprint RetrospectiveATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)After-Action Review
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Agile Sprint Retrospective | ![]() Architecture ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) | ![]() Operations After-Action Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. | ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter | Several meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | Scrum Team | Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Improvement actions, Team agreements | Prioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigations | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning | ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders | LearningOperationsImprovement |



