View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Product Discovery Smoke Test |  Product Discovery Riskiest Assumption Test |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-5 Tage | 1-2 Wochen pro Iteration | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | Nutzertraffic | 2-6 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | Prioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |