methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30 min Setup, dann laufend1-5 Tage1-2 h1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyoneNutzertraffic4-12Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
RAID Log, Status Report SourceInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods