View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Facilitation Expectation Mapping | ![]() Decision Making DACI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-10 | 3-12 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment |



