View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() UX Research Personas | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-3 Tage | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | Internes Team | 3-15 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | ROAM Board, Owner List | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |



