View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Systems Thinking CATWOE Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-5 Tage | 45-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, Constraints |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders |