View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 2-4 h | 60–90 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-8 | 2-8 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |