View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 20-60 min | 15-45 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 1 | 1-3 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas |



