View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Knowledge Modeling NeOn Methodology | ![]() Operations Barrier Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | The NeOn Methodology structures ontology work as a controlled process with reuse, scenarios, and reviews. It is useful when ontologies should not emerge ad hoc but modularly and reusably. | For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 2-6 h | Mehrere Wochen bis Monate | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-8 | 2-10 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Ontology Requirements Specification, Reuse Plan, Ontology Modules, Evaluation Report | Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RiskRoot causeSafety | OntologyMethodologyReuseSemanticEngineering | Root causeSafetyIncident |



