View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Decision Making Red Teaming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-3 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 1-8 | 3-15 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | ROAM Board, Owner List | Challenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation Plan |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | SensemakingDecisionRationale | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskDecisionSensemaking |