View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 15-45 min | 20-40 min pro Story | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 1-3 | 3-6 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |